PROCUREMENT ACT

01

What it is, in one paragraph

The Procurement Act 2023 replaced the old rules for new public procurements in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. Scotland runs its own regime. The Republic of Ireland is separate again, so if you bid on both sides of the Irish Sea you are working to two rulebooks, not one.

It was meant to do three things: simplify rules that had built up over decades, open public contracts to a wider range of suppliers, and make the whole process more open to view from start to finish. For civils, rail and building contractors, the third one is where the work changes.

02

What changes for a contractor

Four things matter if you are bidding for public work in construction or infrastructure.

• More is published, and earlier

  Information now goes out across the life of a procurement rather than mostly at award. That is useful intelligence on frameworks and pipelines — and every competitor has it too. The advantage goes to whoever actually reads it.

• Competitions vary more

  Buyers have more room to design a procedure that suits what they are buying. Expect less standardisation between one tender and the next, and drop the assumption that this ITT will look like the last one.

• You get told how you were assessed

  Suppliers receive information on how their bid was judged. It is the most useful input to your next submission, and it is routinely filed and never opened.

• Award criteria have widened

  The framing has moved beyond lowest price. Quality, social value and confidence in delivery carry weight — and they have to be evidenced, not asserted.

03

Transparency cuts both ways

The word doing the heavy lifting in the Act is transparency, and in construction it is not a one-way benefit.

More is visible about what you win, what you are paid and how you perform. Contract award notices, and in time performance information, sit in public where a client, a competitor or a journalist can find them. A claim you made in a bid three years ago is easier to check against what actually happened on site.

The same openness is a research tool. What was published about the framework you did not get onto, and about the contractor who did, is available to you as well — and almost nobody uses it.

04

Where the responsibility lands

Openness moves responsibility towards the supplier. If the evidence is public, the duty to be accurate about your own record sits with you, not with the buyer who has to take your word for it.

In practice that means three things for a bid team. Social value commitments are now promises somebody may come back and measure, so do not commit to what delivery cannot staff. Method statements are read against what you have actually built, so the project reference has to be genuinely comparable. And on a joint venture, every partner’s claims travel under one submission — the JV carries them together, however they were drafted.

None of this is a legal opinion. It is what changes about the writing.

05

What it does not change

Somebody still has to answer the question. The Act changes how competitions are run and what gets published. It does not change the fact that a person — often an engineer or an estimator rather than a bid specialist — has to write a response against a specification, to a deadline, using evidence they have to go and find first.

And evidence still beats intent. A more open regime raises the value of being able to show something and lowers the value of claiming it.

06

What to do about it

Four practical changes, none of which need a lawyer.

• Read every pack as if it is new

  Procedural variation is the norm now. Working from last year’s submission because the questions “will be much the same” was always a risk. It is a bigger one.

• Collect your feedback and use it

  Whatever form the assessment information arrives in, it is worth more than most bid libraries. Read it before the next tender rather than after.

• Get your evidence findable

  More competition and more scrutiny make the ability to substantiate a claim quickly more valuable, not less. That is a filing problem before it is a writing problem.

• Watch what is published about the ones you lost

  Award notices on contracts you did not win are a free competitor briefing. Somebody in the business should have that as a standing job.

07

Where this connects to what we do

Blue Edge does not advise on procurement law, and this page is not legal advice. What we do is the part that comes afterwards: checking a response against the requirements actually set, showing what has not been covered, and making your own evidence usable by whoever is writing.

How that works →

Regulatory change lands unevenly, and the useful information is usually what happened on a live bid rather than what the guidance says. That is what the blog is for — one email a fortnight at most.

Related

Start with one conversation

Bring a live bid, or a tender you have already submitted. Thirty minutes, no preparation needed.